Contextual focus point: Frank Auerbach’s portraiture:
Frank Auerbach’s approach to portraiture is legendary and through it he makes some very interesting points about the nature of portraiture and of drawing. Research what makes Frank Auerbach’s portraits unique, and how he used the passage of time in them. Think about why he might have done that and make notes about how working from life differs from working from a photograph in terms of the way we experience the time spent. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/frank-auerbach-676
Research source material: frank auerbach
From Rembrandt, Sickert and Bomberg to Auerbach
Capturing the essence of a person visually is not an easy task. The self portraits below are all the artist’s attempt to convey, not just a flat image of themselves, but also, and more, a feeling and insight of sorts into how they perceive themselves to be, at a time, in time:
Auerbach’s early self portrait of 1958 displays touches of Rembrandt’s use of dark and light to capture an image that some have said “possess remnants of the heavy shadow of the war” (Second World War). It also shows his use of layering, scraping back the charcoal with an erasure, and building the final ‘acceptable’ image: His 2014 self portrait displays firm and dominant black lines, almost in a way to portray his assertion of being – ‘this is what I am’, in a similar way as seen in both Sickert’s and Bomberg’s self portraits: Getting to the core of the character of a sitter, self included, is something that takes time and is rarely pulled off at a single attempt. Frank Auerbach didn’t record himself as frequently as Rembrandt, Sickert or Bomberg, but he did learn from their influences on his own work.Auerbach developed a fascination, some might say an obsession, for inviting a small coterie of people to sit for his portraits, including: Estella (Stella) Olive West (“E.O.W.”); Julia Yardley Mills (“J.Y.M.”); Catherine Lampert and William Feaver.
“I find myself simply more engaged when I know the people. They get older and change; there is something touching about that, about recording something that’s getting on.” Available at: https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/exhibition/frank-auerbach/auerbach-introduction [Accessed: 3 January 2019].
Here we find a feature of Auerbach’s developing work that can also be found in his mentor Bomberg’s later style of applying heavily worked paint in an expressionistic manner:“Ridges and gullies, dragged paint, violent swirls across the surface. Busy in a world of restless squashy movement. Thick layers, scraped back, creating the image through working with the paint and the surface.”
(From: Phaidon Press (1994) The Art Book.,p.21.)
Hands, brushes, palette knives, putty scrapers and paint squeezed from the tube get applied to the task – hands on in spades with heavy impasto work – scraping back, layering and sculpting the essence of the person he sees before him.
The brush mark making in Head of J.Y.M. No.1 seems to combine an impasto application to a more fluid capturing of the sitter:
This later portrait shows a marginally less abstracted rendering in paint, but retains the daubs and smears of his impasto style in an almost monochromatic snap-shot of his sitter J.Y.M. Fluid brush strokes, almost swirling across the canvas captures a less strident portrait of his sitter, although the use of black lines still directs the image: Auerbach’s later portrait of William Feaver sees a return to the use of vibrant colour in the thick impasto mark making. The scraping and layering are evident. The black lines are there and the whole visceral experience of the act of painting is clearly obvious to the viewer: Most recently we have this somewhat muddy looking tonal portrait of Catherine Lampert, still with the definitive black lines and suggestions of an image in what seems like frantic mark making: For me, what makes Auerbach’s portraits unique is the uncovering of character, personality and form of his sitters. The viewer has to work at this, in a way almost has hard as Auerbach had to work in the doing of it. The mark making is gestural and is directed at teasing out the image on the canvas.There is an exciting energy in these portraits that pushes the traditional concept of portraiture to a level beyond what inspired and influence him in the works of Rembrandt, Sickert and Bomberg. It is almost as if Auerbach took his sitters apart in his mind as he applied paint, scraped back and re-painted, all the time seeking further into what he saw as the essence of their being.
The fact that he used the same band of happy models over many years enabled him to delve deeper into his memories of them and the triggers of seeing them sitting before him anew each time.
As a final comment, I would suggest that in viewing Auerbach’s portraits, I concur with the statements he made to film in The Last Art Film on the three areas that, for him, make a work of art. His portraits are not “immobile”, they are “engaging” to the viewer; there is “expression” and “the feeling of an idea”; and there is “tense surface character” in the mark making. His portraits are indeed “ineluctable”.
Notes taken from The Last Art Film – Auerbach, J. (2012) The last Art Film. Directed by Jake Auerbach [DVD]. UK: Jake Auerbach Films. [Accessed: 14 January 2017].
Whether or not the same energy and insightfulness would have/could have been captured in working from a photograph of his sitters is debatable. While a photograph might bring up a memory of the person or scene and the point in time when it was taken, there us no escaping the fact that addressing the subject in real time, and over time, has the potential to capture much more of the artist’s own acts of looking, thinking, changing, reflecting and doing into what becomes the completed (maybe never finished) piece of art.
Stuart Brownlee – 512319
13 January 2019